Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Cambodian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Cambodians
Ecuadorians
9,346
SOCIAL INDEX
90.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
19th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Cambodian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,312,469 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.244. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.084% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to a decrease of 84.0 Ecuadorians.
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($117,780 compared to $95,114, a difference of 23.8%), per capita income ($51,731 compared to $41,958, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,342 compared to $93,739, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,571 compared to $53,911, a difference of 3.1%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($45,014 compared to $39,117, a difference of 15.1%).
Income Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $51,731 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $117,780 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $96,324 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,386 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,516 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $45,014 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,571 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,148 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $114,342 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,892 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.8% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 55.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.7%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.54%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 6.0%).
Poverty Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.4% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.2% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.4% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 14.9% |
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.6% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 5.9% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.5% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.4% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.1% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 37.0% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 82.3% |
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.1%), births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.7%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.32, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.5% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.7% | Poor 33.3% |
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 108.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 26.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Tragic 4.5% |
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 76.0%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 55.5%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Excellent 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.9% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.7% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 54.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.2% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.0% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Cambodian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.69%), male disability (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Cambodian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.6% |