Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Argentinean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Argentineans

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
8,055
SOCIAL INDEX
78.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
90th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Argentinean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 235,269,328 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.239. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.212% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 211.5 Ecuadorians.
Argentinean Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $41,958, a difference of 18.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $54,958, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($112,665 compared to $95,114, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.45%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $39,117, a difference of 7.2%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $45,214, a difference of 11.5%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,862
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,665
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,960
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,399
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,117
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,952
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,154
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$103,111
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,103
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,246
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.9%

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 37.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 30.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.9%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.2%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.9%

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.9%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
18.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.52%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.1%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
82.3%

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
30.0%
Poor
33.3%

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 103.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 38.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 34.8%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.5%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
4.5%

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 56.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 51.2%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.95%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Fair
95.5%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Good
92.7%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.4%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.2%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.2%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
43.3%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.2%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.9%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and male disability (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Argentinean vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricArgentineanEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%