Scottish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,692,387 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.243. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to a decrease of 15.9 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $54,958, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $95,114, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.9%), median earnings ($46,463 compared to $45,214, a difference of 2.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $91,574, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 52.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 52.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.88%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.0%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 33.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 25.1%), currently married (49.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.72%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 236.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 19.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 45.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 109.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 50.6%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.7%).