Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Soviet Union
Ecuadorians
7,833
SOCIAL INDEX
75.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
103rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Soviet Union Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,602,228 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.574% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 574.2 Ecuadorians.
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $41,958, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($119,262 compared to $95,114, a difference of 25.4%), and median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $51,596, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $54,958, a difference of 14.4%).
Income Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $54,202 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $119,262 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,098 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $54,290 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,382 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,556 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,340 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,457 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,008 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,848 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.2% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 34.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.6% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.3% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.3% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Poor 4.8% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.6% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Labor Participation Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 83.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 33.0%), and births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.7%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Tragic 60.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 24.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.2% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 26.3% | Poor 33.3% |
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 30.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 6.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 82.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 45.7% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.1%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 67.5%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.7% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.7% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.1% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.1% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.5% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.6% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Soviet Union vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Soviet Union | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 0.95% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.0% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |