Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Ecuadorians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,235,087 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Ecuadorians.
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,911, a difference of 20.4%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,574, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,596, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,214, a difference of 11.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.1%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.64%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 21.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 33.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 189.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 66.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 58.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 74.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 78.4%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |