Pennsylvania German vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,299,803 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.310. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to a decrease of 14.2 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 34.0%), median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $39,117, a difference of 12.4%), and per capita income ($37,842 compared to $41,958, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $51,596, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $93,739, a difference of 1.9%), and median family income ($91,763 compared to $95,114, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 41.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 33.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 34.1%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 47.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.8%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 15.8%), and currently married (49.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 106.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 70.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 99.2%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 31.9%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (88.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.70%), 11th grade (90.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and 10th grade (91.9% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 78.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%).