Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Lithuania

Ecuadorians

Exceptional
Poor
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,428,782 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Lithuania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lithuania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lithuania corresponds to an increase of 198.5 Ecuadorians.
Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.9%), median family income ($118,053 compared to $95,114, a difference of 24.1%), and median male earnings ($63,346 compared to $51,596, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,028 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($43,317 compared to $39,117, a difference of 10.7%), and median earnings ($52,769 compared to $45,214, a difference of 16.7%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,361
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$118,053
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,836
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,769
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,346
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,317
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,028
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,149
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$114,336
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,087
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
22.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 60.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 50.7%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.7%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.9%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.8%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.2%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.9%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.2%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
82.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Poor
33.3%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 131.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.8%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
4.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 74.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.4%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lithuania and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LithuaniaEcuadorian
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.5%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.9%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%