Shoshone vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,125,779 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.404. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to a decrease of 26.4 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,072 compared to $41,958, a difference of 13.2%), median household income ($72,660 compared to $82,070, a difference of 13.0%), and median female earnings ($34,677 compared to $39,117, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.4%), median male earnings ($47,930 compared to $51,596, a difference of 7.6%), and median family income ($87,872 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.9%), single male poverty (16.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 66.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.30%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.8% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 0.87%), married-couple households (43.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.99%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.32, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 110.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 98.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 77.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 77.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.2%), master's degree (11.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 60.5%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 48.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.7%).