Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,169,112 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.536% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 535.8 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $54,958, a difference of 8.9%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $93,739, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.18%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $91,574, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($45,928 compared to $45,214, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 22.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.40%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.4%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.0%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.26%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and family households (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 121.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 45.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.2%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.14%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%).