Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Portuguese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Portuguese

Ecuadorians

Average
Poor
4,363
SOCIAL INDEX
41.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
201st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Portuguese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 293,879,027 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 24.2 Ecuadorians.
Portuguese Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $93,739, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $53,911, a difference of 0.97%), median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $39,117, a difference of 2.7%), and per capita income ($44,362 compared to $41,958, a difference of 5.7%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,362
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,286
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,976
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,032
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,663
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,177
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,436
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,429
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,309
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,440
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.9%

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 41.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.2%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.8%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Fair
12.9%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Excellent
20.5%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.8%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
14.9%

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
6.5%

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 27.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.4%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.4%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
82.3%

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.8%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.57%), family households (65.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.6%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.8%
Poor
33.3%

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 165.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 65.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 55.3%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
4.5%

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 0.26%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.91%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
92.0%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
44.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Poor
13.9%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 47.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.52%).
Portuguese vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricPortugueseEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.5%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%