Sioux vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sioux
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sioux
Ecuadorians
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Sioux Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,789,879 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 49.5 Ecuadorians.
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $41,958, a difference of 23.7%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $82,070, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,089 compared to $91,574, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $54,958, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $39,117, a difference of 11.6%).
Income Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $33,921 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,386 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,792 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,448 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,566 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,063 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $46,417 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,089 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $81,750 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $52,509 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.3% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (22.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 77.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 60.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and receiving food stamps (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 13.1%).
Poverty Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 20.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 23.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 26.9% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 25.6% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 22.2% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 31.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 23.9% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.8% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 14.9% |
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.7% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Fair 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 11.5% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 32.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 61.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 75.0% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.5% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 79.7% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 80.4% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.2% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.4%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Good 64.6% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.5% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.52 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.3% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.9% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 41.0% | Poor 33.3% |
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 126.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 78.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.8% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 4.5% |
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 66.9%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.21%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and ged/equivalency (82.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.6% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.4% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.0% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 29.1% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.7% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Disability Metric | Sioux | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.8% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.9% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.3% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |