Sioux vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sioux

Ecuadorians

Fair
Poor
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Sioux Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,789,879 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.208. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 49.5 Ecuadorians.
Sioux Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $41,958, a difference of 23.7%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $82,070, a difference of 21.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,089 compared to $91,574, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,509 compared to $54,958, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $39,117, a difference of 11.6%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricSiouxEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,921
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,386
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,792
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,448
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,566
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,063
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,417
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,089
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,750
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,509
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.3%
Exceptional
22.9%

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (22.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 77.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 60.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and receiving food stamps (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 13.1%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricSiouxEcuadorian
Poverty
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.6%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.6%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
22.2%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
31.3%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.9%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.8%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.9%

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 58.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 55.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSiouxEcuadorian
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.5%

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 32.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSiouxEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.2%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.0%
Tragic
82.3%

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.4%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSiouxEcuadorian
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.52
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Poor
33.3%

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 126.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 78.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.7%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSiouxEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.8%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
4.5%

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 66.9%), master's degree (10.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 31.1%), and bachelor's degree (29.1% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.4% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 0.21%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and ged/equivalency (82.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricSiouxEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.4%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.0%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Sioux vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.32%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Sioux vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricSiouxEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.7%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%