Immigrants from Central America vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 311,307,032 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.501. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 10.3 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $41,958, a difference of 20.0%), median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $39,117, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $91,574, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $54,958, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $53,911, a difference of 5.7%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 15.5%), single female poverty (24.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.85%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.43%), female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.5%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.1% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 1.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 154.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 89.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 16.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 39.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 66.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 40.2%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.6%), and bachelor's degree (27.5% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%).