Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Jordanian
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Jordanians
Ecuadorians
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Jordanian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,012,600 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 28.5 Ecuadorians.
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $54,958, a difference of 17.0%), wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $93,739, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $53,911, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $39,117, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $91,574, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,605 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $109,865 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,794 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,632 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,500 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,464 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,796 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,186 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $109,376 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,313 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 38.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.9%).
Poverty Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Exceptional 18.8% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.4% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.3% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 9.0% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.5% |
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 15.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.68%).
Labor Participation Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Fair 36.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Average 84.4% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 82.3% |
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.9%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.91%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Poor 33.3% |
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 166.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 47.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.5% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.6% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Tragic 4.5% |
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.8%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Education Level Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Excellent 2.0% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Good 98.1% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Good 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Excellent 97.7% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Excellent 97.5% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.3% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.2% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.0% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.2% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Excellent 4.7% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 1.5% |
Jordanian vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Jordanian | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.8% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |