Czech vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Ecuadorians
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 292,706,157 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.844. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.384% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 383.8 Ecuadorians.
Czech vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.4%), householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $54,958, a difference of 11.4%), and median family income ($105,839 compared to $95,114, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.32%), median earnings ($47,221 compared to $45,214, a difference of 4.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,911, a difference of 4.8%).
Income Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Czech vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 61.8%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 61.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 6.6%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Czech vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 42.8%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Czech vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 39.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 82.3% |
Czech vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.5%), currently married (49.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.78%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Poor 33.3% |
Czech vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 230.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 64.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 19.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 46.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 60.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 4.5% |
Czech vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 98.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and college, under 1 year (67.1% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czech vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 41.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |