Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Ecuadorian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Ecuadorians
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ecuadorian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,246,511 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.139% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 138.7 Ecuadorians.
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $41,958, a difference of 10.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $53,911, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $91,574, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $93,739, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $95,114, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $54,958, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Poor $41,958 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Tragic $95,114 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Poor $82,070 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Poor $45,214 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Tragic $51,596 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Fair $39,117 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Exceptional $53,911 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Poor $91,574 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Tragic $93,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Tragic $54,958 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 31.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.14%), male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 19.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 18.8% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 30.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 15.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Tragic 20.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Tragic 31.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 72.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 82.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.9%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.62%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Tragic 43.5% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.32 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Poor 33.3% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 178.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 72.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 59.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 22.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Tragic 77.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Tragic 42.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 14.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Tragic 4.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 23.2%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Tragic 96.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 95.5% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 94.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Tragic 93.6% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 91.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Tragic 90.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 89.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Tragic 88.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Tragic 85.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Tragic 81.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Tragic 54.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 43.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 35.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Ecuadorian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Ecuadorian |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Average 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.6% |