Polish vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Polish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Poles

Ecuadorians

Excellent
Poor
8,413
SOCIAL INDEX
81.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
72nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Polish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,000,387 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Polish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Poles within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Poles corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Ecuadorians.
Polish Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Polish vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 24.6%), median family income ($108,507 compared to $95,114, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,952 compared to $93,739, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,407 compared to $53,911, a difference of 2.9%), median female earnings ($40,371 compared to $39,117, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($48,659 compared to $45,214, a difference of 7.6%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricPolishEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,123
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,507
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,472
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,659
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,139
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,371
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,407
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,685
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,952
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,598
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Exceptional
22.9%

Polish vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 61.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 53.4%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.9%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 5.0%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricPolishEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.8%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Poor
13.0%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.9%

Polish vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.3%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPolishEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.3%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%

Polish vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 34.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPolishEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.6%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
82.3%

Polish vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.2%), currently married (48.9% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.0%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPolishEcuadorian
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.5%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.09
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Poor
33.3%

Polish vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 169.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 43.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 17.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 38.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 42.7%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPolishEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.4%
Tragic
4.5%

Polish vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 105.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricPolishEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.9%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.5%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.0%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
39.1%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.7%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Polish vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Polish and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.5%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 36.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Polish vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricPolishEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.3%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%