Belgian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,040,113 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Belgian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belgians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belgians corresponds to an increase of 137.6 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 25.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,915 compared to $54,958, a difference of 9.0%), and median family income ($102,788 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,382 compared to $39,117, a difference of 1.9%), median household income ($84,008 compared to $82,070, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($46,375 compared to $45,214, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 53.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 47.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.47%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment (4.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.4% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 38.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 23.0%), currently married (48.7% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 184.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 51.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 41.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 50.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 87.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and college, under 1 year (66.2% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belgian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.5%).