Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Ecuadorian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Ecuadorians

Good
Poor
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Ecuadorian Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,901,104 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.065. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 20.9 Ecuadorians.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Ecuadorian Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($107,502 compared to $95,114, a difference of 13.0%), and per capita income ($47,248 compared to $41,958, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,825 compared to $39,117, a difference of 4.4%), median household income ($86,635 compared to $82,070, a difference of 5.6%), and median earnings ($48,617 compared to $45,214, a difference of 7.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Poor
$41,958
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$95,114
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Poor
$82,070
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Poor
$45,214
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$51,596
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Fair
$39,117
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Exceptional
$53,911
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Poor
$91,574
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$93,739
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$54,958
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
22.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 65.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 43.7%), and receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 5.8%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 8.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.3%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.9%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.1%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.7%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.2%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
20.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Good
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 30.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Tragic
31.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
72.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
82.3%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.8%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (61.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Exceptional
3.32
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
43.6%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Poor
33.3%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 113.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Tragic
22.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Tragic
77.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Tragic
42.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
14.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
4.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 115.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.0%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.7%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
97.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Tragic
96.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
94.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
93.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
91.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
90.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
88.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
81.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
54.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
35.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.7%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Ecuadorian Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynEcuadorian
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Fair
23.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.5%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Average
17.2%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%