Immigrants from Guatemala vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,075,699 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 13.6 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $91,574, a difference of 12.6%), per capita income ($37,550 compared to $41,958, a difference of 11.7%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $51,596, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,950 compared to $54,958, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $53,911, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.69%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.4%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.14%), married-couple households (42.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (42.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 103.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 52.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 14.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 40.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.0%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 20.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.8% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.64%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.0%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.63%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%).