Australian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,620,987 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 180.4 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $37,203, a difference of 40.0%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $88,209, a difference of 34.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $80,843, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $47,848, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $54,133, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 40.0%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 37.6%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 24.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (47.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 78.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 65.0%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 43.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.8%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.1%).