Immigrants from Chile vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,138,519 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.829. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.289% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 288.6 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $37,203, a difference of 24.2%), median household income ($88,388 compared to $72,682, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $80,843, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $47,848, a difference of 9.6%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $48,669, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 32.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.6%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.39%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.9%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.080%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 52.7%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 49.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.9%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%).