Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bahamas
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bahamas

Cherokee

Tragic
Fair
1,107
SOCIAL INDEX
8.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
322nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Bahamas Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,261,692 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to an increase of 63.5 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Bahamas Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 30.2%), median male earnings ($45,176 compared to $48,669, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $80,843, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,193 compared to $37,203, a difference of 0.030%), median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $34,742, a difference of 0.82%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $54,133, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,193
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,732
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,349
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,861
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,176
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,027
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,793
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,910
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,177
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,174
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty (16.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and poverty (14.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.4%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.0%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.2%), married-couple households (41.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.7%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.1%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.8%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.5%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.5%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.24%), ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Poor
95.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.2%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.1%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 45.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.0%).
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BahamasCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%