Tsimshian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tsimshian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaBangladeshBelarusBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGuatemalaGuyanaHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIrelandItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tsimshian

Cherokee

Average
Fair
4,927
SOCIAL INDEX
46.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
189th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Tsimshian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,523,082 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Tsimshian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tsimshian within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tsimshian corresponds to a decrease of 11.6 Cherokee.
Tsimshian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,809 compared to $80,843, a difference of 21.0%), median family income ($101,543 compared to $88,209, a difference of 15.1%), and wage/income gap (23.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,836 compared to $48,669, a difference of 0.34%), median earnings ($43,695 compared to $41,252, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,202 compared to $54,133, a difference of 7.5%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricTsimshianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,344
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,543
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,346
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,695
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,836
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,530
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,649
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,809
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Poor
$96,783
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,202
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (11.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 73.6%), single father poverty (12.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 54.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.6%), male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricTsimshianCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.8%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.2%

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (13.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 116.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (18.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 70.9%), and male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.4%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTsimshianCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.5%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Poor
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (88.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTsimshianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
88.7%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
79.0%

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.0%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTsimshianCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
36.7%

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.0%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTsimshianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in college, 1 year or more (57.9% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 8.9%), college, under 1 year (64.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (98.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricTsimshianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.9%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.3%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.3%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
57.9%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
28.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Tsimshian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tsimshian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age over 75 (59.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.1%), male disability (15.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.2%).
Tsimshian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricTsimshianCherokee
Disability
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
59.2%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%