Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nepal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nepal

Cherokee

Good
Fair
7,773
SOCIAL INDEX
75.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
106th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Nepal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,451,566 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Nepal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nepal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nepal corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Nepal Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,046 compared to $72,682, a difference of 19.8%), median family income ($104,966 compared to $88,209, a difference of 19.0%), and per capita income ($44,187 compared to $37,203, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,611 compared to $47,848, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,843 compared to $54,133, a difference of 14.2%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,187
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Good
$104,966
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Good
$87,046
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,925
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,615
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,704
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,611
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,322
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,190
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,843
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.8%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Good
13.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.7%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.0%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.1%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 24.0%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.69%), currently married (46.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.4%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Fair
46.1%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.0%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 30.4%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.5%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.9%), master's degree (17.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.2%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 10th grade (93.7% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.2%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.5%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nepal and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 69.6%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 55.2%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.36%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 24.7%).
Immigrants from Nepal vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NepalCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.6%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%