New Zealander vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Cherokee

Excellent
Fair
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,139,989 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.736% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 735.6 Cherokee.
New Zealander Integration in Cherokee Communities

New Zealander vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,203, a difference of 35.9%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $72,682, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $88,209, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,848, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $34,742, a difference of 22.2%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.4%

New Zealander vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.4%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.2%

New Zealander vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%

New Zealander vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
79.0%

New Zealander vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
36.7%

New Zealander vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.7%

New Zealander vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 80.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 72.4%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.5%

New Zealander vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.3%).
New Zealander vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderCherokee
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%