New Zealander vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Cherokee
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,139,989 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.736% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 735.6 Cherokee.
New Zealander vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,203, a difference of 35.9%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $72,682, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $88,209, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,848, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $34,742, a difference of 22.2%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
New Zealander vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.4%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
New Zealander vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
New Zealander vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 79.0% |
New Zealander vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.4%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.96%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 36.7% |
New Zealander vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 12.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
New Zealander vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 80.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 72.4%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
New Zealander vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.3%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Cherokee |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |