Immigrants from Philippines vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,836,966 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 13.6 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,899 compared to $72,682, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $80,843, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $86,125, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.1%), median male earnings ($55,809 compared to $48,669, a difference of 14.7%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $41,252, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 47.6%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.92%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 21.4%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (68.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.3%), bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and master's degree (13.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.2% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.32%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.82%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 48.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.9%).