Tohono O'odham vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,129,191 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 3.3 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 23.8%), median male earnings ($39,543 compared to $48,669, a difference of 23.1%), and per capita income ($30,256 compared to $37,203, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $34,742, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $47,848, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,121 compared to $54,133, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 94.7%), family poverty (20.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 92.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (20.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 90.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 12.1%), single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and single female poverty (34.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 33.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 86.5%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 82.1%), and unemployment (8.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 28.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.8%), births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.53 compared to 3.18, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 101.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 21.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 9.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.9%), bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and associate's degree (31.8% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 0.51%), female disability (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.95%).