Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,608,994 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 86.4 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,054 compared to $72,682, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($43,464 compared to $37,203, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $86,125, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $48,669, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $47,848, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $54,133, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 13.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.6%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.86%), family households (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 32.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.2%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.0%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.3%).