Icelander vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Icelander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Icelanders

Cherokee

Good
Fair
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Icelander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,501,977 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 4.1 Cherokee.
Icelander Integration in Cherokee Communities

Icelander vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,987 compared to $37,203, a difference of 20.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $86,125, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $88,209, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.16%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $47,848, a difference of 7.1%), and median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $34,742, a difference of 12.6%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricIcelanderCherokee
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$44,987
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Good
$104,282
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Good
$85,797
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Good
$46,916
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,415
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,109
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,247
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,560
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,261
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,270
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.5%
Tragic
27.4%

Icelander vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 32.8%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.9%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricIcelanderCherokee
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.2%

Icelander vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.9%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIcelanderCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Icelander vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIcelanderCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
79.0%

Icelander vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.0%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.66%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIcelanderCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
36.7%

Icelander vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIcelanderCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Icelander vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.2%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricIcelanderCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.5%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Icelander vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 21.0%).
Icelander vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricIcelanderCherokee
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%