Immigrants from Fiji vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,130,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.201% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 200.9 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,933 compared to $72,682, a difference of 29.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $80,843, a difference of 28.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $86,125, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $48,669, a difference of 12.9%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $37,203, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($48,305 compared to $41,252, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 48.4%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.48%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 25.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.7%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.20%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 101.7%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and bachelor's degree (33.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%), nursery school (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 93.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.68%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.6%).