Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Brazil

Cherokee

Good
Fair
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 313,728,562 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $37,203, a difference of 29.5%), median household income ($90,907 compared to $72,682, a difference of 25.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,534 compared to $80,843, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $54,133, a difference of 15.2%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,164
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,418
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,907
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,463
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,324
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,273
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,487
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$100,534
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,470
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,364
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 36.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 35.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.2%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.90%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.98%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.51%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 23.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.36%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.7%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 34.3%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.2%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.0%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.7%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BrazilCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%