Pakistani vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pakistani
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pakistanis

Cherokee

Good
Fair
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Pakistani Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,442,135 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Pakistani communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pakistanis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.172% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pakistanis corresponds to an increase of 171.9 Cherokee.
Pakistani Integration in Cherokee Communities

Pakistani vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,638 compared to $72,682, a difference of 23.3%), per capita income ($45,587 compared to $37,203, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,317 compared to $86,125, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,325 compared to $47,848, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($56,719 compared to $48,669, a difference of 16.5%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricPakistaniCherokee
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,587
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,390
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,638
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,254
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,719
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,596
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,325
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,401
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,317
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,844
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Pakistani vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 35.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 32.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.3%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricPakistaniCherokee
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.2%

Pakistani vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 27.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPakistaniCherokee
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%

Pakistani vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPakistaniCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.6%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.7%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.8%
Tragic
79.0%

Pakistani vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.3%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.45%), currently married (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPakistaniCherokee
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
36.7%

Pakistani vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.3%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPakistaniCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.7%

Pakistani vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 41.1%), and master's degree (15.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricPakistaniCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Fair
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.5%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
48.1%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Pakistani vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pakistani and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.4%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.0%).
Pakistani vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricPakistaniCherokee
Disability
Average
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Excellent
12.0%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.1%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.2%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%