Lumbee vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,540,606 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $47,848, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $80,843, a difference of 34.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $54,133, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $34,742, a difference of 6.9%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $41,252, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $48,669, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 73.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 65.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 64.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 25.3%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 36.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 47.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 29.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.69%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.8%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.4%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.4%), male disability (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.0%).