Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Puget Sound Salish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Puget Sound Salish

Cherokee

Average
Fair
5,672
SOCIAL INDEX
54.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
172nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Puget Sound Salish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,498,021 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Cherokee.
Puget Sound Salish Integration in Cherokee Communities

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $47,848, a difference of 16.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $80,843, a difference of 15.9%), and median household income ($84,011 compared to $72,682, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.2%), median male earnings ($53,704 compared to $48,669, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $54,133, a difference of 10.7%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,495
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$97,958
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Fair
$84,011
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Average
$46,333
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,704
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,376
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,543
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,661
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,340
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Fair
$59,934
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Tragic
27.4%

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 35.6%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.8%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
13.2%

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.5%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.9%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.7%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.45%), and family households (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.4%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
36.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.7%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.5%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.9%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.2%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.9%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.5%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 82.2%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 0.82%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.5%).
Puget Sound Salish vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricPuget Sound SalishCherokee
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.97%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.9%