Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Cherokee
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,976,328 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.466. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.254% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 253.7 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($41,853 compared to $37,203, a difference of 12.5%), and median female earnings ($39,049 compared to $34,742, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $54,133, a difference of 5.2%), median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $48,669, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $47,848, a difference of 7.2%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,853 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,647 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,873 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,198 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,962 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,049 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,278 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,451 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,815 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,944 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.4% | Tragic 27.4% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and family poverty (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.9% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.41%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.3% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.0% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.9% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.5%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.19%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.9% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 89.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 8.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 29.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.4% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.1% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 29.7%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.5%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%), and ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.2% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.3% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Cherokee |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.9% |