Immigrants from Australia vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,723,736 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.086% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 85.7 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $37,203, a difference of 55.8%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $88,209, a difference of 43.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $80,843, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $47,848, a difference of 18.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $54,133, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 48.2%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 44.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 37.7%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 33.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.44%), currently married (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 78.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 27.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 109.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 92.8%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 59.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.6%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.0%).