Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,985,364 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 2.7 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $47,848, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $72,682, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,267 compared to $88,209, a difference of 0.070%), median earnings ($41,737 compared to $41,252, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($38,065 compared to $37,203, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 46.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.1%), and receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.10%), female poverty (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.0%), currently married (43.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 76.8%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 57.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.4%).