Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uganda

Cherokee

Good
Fair
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,154,918 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 151.9 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $37,203, a difference of 21.1%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $72,682, a difference of 20.5%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $88,209, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $47,848, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $54,133, a difference of 14.5%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,043
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,188
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,553
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,041
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,064
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,739
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,374
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,698
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,584
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,976
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
24.9%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.9%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Average
9.1%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Average
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.9%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.2%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (62.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Good
3.23
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.5%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.7%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.1%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.3%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.7%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.5%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.7%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.4%).
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UgandaCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%