Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uganda
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Uganda
Cherokee
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,154,918 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Uganda communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uganda within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uganda corresponds to an increase of 151.9 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,043 compared to $37,203, a difference of 21.1%), median household income ($87,553 compared to $72,682, a difference of 20.5%), and median family income ($106,188 compared to $88,209, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,374 compared to $47,848, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,976 compared to $54,133, a difference of 14.5%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $45,043 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,188 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $87,553 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,041 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,064 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,739 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,374 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,698 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,584 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,976 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 24.9% | Tragic 27.4% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and single female poverty (20.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
Poverty | Poor 12.8% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Average 9.1% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Average 13.5% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Fair 17.0% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Fair 16.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Excellent 20.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Average 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.5% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.5% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.2% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.0% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.0% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Tragic 79.0% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.2%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (62.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
Family Households | Tragic 62.7% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.23 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 36.7% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.7%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 25.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.0% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.0% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 52.3%), and master's degree (16.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (88.9% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.48%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Average 85.7% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Excellent 66.5% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.9% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.6% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Uganda vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uganda and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.8%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.79%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.4%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Uganda | Cherokee |
Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.2% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.8% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |