Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Cherokee

Poor
Fair
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,499,782 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.021% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 20.7 Cherokee.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,322 compared to $80,843, a difference of 14.2%), median earnings ($45,812 compared to $41,252, a difference of 11.1%), and median female earnings ($38,573 compared to $34,742, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.91%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $54,133, a difference of 3.9%), and per capita income ($39,608 compared to $37,203, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 35.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and receiving food stamps (16.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 11.7%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.80%), family households (65.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 6.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 74.8%), professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and master's degree (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.2%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.090%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresCherokee
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.9%