Filipino vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 238,032,660 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.079% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 79.2 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $80,843, a difference of 59.2%), median household income ($115,509 compared to $72,682, a difference of 58.9%), and per capita income ($59,066 compared to $37,203, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $47,848, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $54,133, a difference of 41.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 87.0%), receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 79.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 77.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 27.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 59.6%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 45.5%), and single mother households (4.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.54%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 136.4%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 129.6%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 105.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 92.0%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 72.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.6%).