Immigrants from Russia vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,171,490 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.301% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 300.7 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $37,203, a difference of 39.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $80,843, a difference of 34.5%), and median household income ($96,378 compared to $72,682, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $47,848, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $54,133, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 44.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 41.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 40.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 35.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.56%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.63%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 95.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 8.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 83.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 73.4%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 70.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.17%), 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 56.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 13.9%).