Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,407,672 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.470. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 40.9 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 22.6%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $34,742, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $54,133, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $47,848, a difference of 0.14%), median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $48,669, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $80,843, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 26.5%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 25.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.41%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.90%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.74%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.3%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 11.8%), and currently married (43.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (61.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.7%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.47%), high school diploma (88.0% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.3%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.6%).