Ecuadorian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 288,850,807 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 3.6 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $80,843, a difference of 13.3%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $72,682, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $54,133, a difference of 1.5%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $48,669, a difference of 6.0%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $88,209, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.9%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 28.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.0%), female unemployment (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 28.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 194.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 42.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 63.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 69.9%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.7%).