Malaysian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Cherokee

Fair
Fair
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,837,677 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 51.8 Cherokee.
Malaysian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Malaysian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($81,064 compared to $72,682, a difference of 11.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $86,125, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $48,669, a difference of 4.3%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $37,203, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($43,844 compared to $41,252, a difference of 6.3%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricMalaysianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.4%

Malaysian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 31.5%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 4.2%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.2%

Malaysian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianCherokee
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Malaysian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.9%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Malaysian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 11.0%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.92%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Tragic
36.7%

Malaysian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Malaysian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 59.1%), bachelor's degree (32.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and associate's degree (41.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.18%), ged/equivalency (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.5%

Malaysian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 37.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.46%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.0%).
Malaysian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.9%