Houma vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Cherokee
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,969,047 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 69.6 Cherokee.
Houma vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 41.0%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $54,133, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $86,125, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $48,669, a difference of 3.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $80,843, a difference of 4.9%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $41,252, a difference of 5.9%).
Income Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Tragic 27.4% |
Houma vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 46.1%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 37.9%), and single father poverty (26.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Houma vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.0%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Houma vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 79.0% |
Houma vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 27.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Houma vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 57.6%), no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 43.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Houma vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 60.2%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 51.6%), and professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Tragic 1.5% |
Houma vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 20.9%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.68%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.4%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Cherokee |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.9% |