Argentinean vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,436,165 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 11.8 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $37,203, a difference of 34.0%), median household income ($93,960 compared to $72,682, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $86,125, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $54,133, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 41.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 37.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 22.3%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 79.9%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 60.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.34%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 64.7%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.3%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 25.0%).