Creek vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,288,478 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 44.3 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $86,125, a difference of 9.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $80,843, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($67,715 compared to $72,682, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $34,742, a difference of 3.9%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $41,252, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 11.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.20%), single father poverty (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.9%), married-couple households (45.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.47%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.10%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.83%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.6%).