Immigrants from Grenada vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,041,894 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 5.2 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 69.5%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $34,742, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $47,848, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $86,125, a difference of 0.67%), median family income ($89,249 compared to $88,209, a difference of 1.2%), and median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $48,669, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 48.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 44.3%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 47.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 43.6%), and male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 58.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.9%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 24.6%), and currently married (39.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 384.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 183.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 153.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 47.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 108.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 153.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 58.5%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 91.8%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 87.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 0.45%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.8%).