Immigrants from Western Europe vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,577,788 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Western Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.915% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Europe corresponds to an increase of 1,915.1 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,065 compared to $37,203, a difference of 34.6%), median family income ($112,688 compared to $88,209, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,654 compared to $80,843, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,957 compared to $47,848, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,933 compared to $54,133, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 31.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.3%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.79%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 41.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 73.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 67.5%), and master's degree (17.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 38.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%).