Chickasaw vs Cherokee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cherokee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Cherokee
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cherokee Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,949,338 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Cherokee.
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,848, a difference of 6.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $86,125, a difference of 4.8%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $72,682, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,133, a difference of 0.75%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,742, a difference of 0.95%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,203 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $88,209 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $72,682 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,252 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $48,669 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $34,742 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,848 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $80,843 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $86,125 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,133 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.9%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 17.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.7%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 0.61%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 61.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 76.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 81.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 79.0% |
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.9%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.86%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.7% |
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 3.9%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.010%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 53.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 38.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Cherokee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.70%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |